http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/HabitualAspect
A value of Aspect Property assigned to the designated element in the clause when the meaning selected for the clause is that which indicates that the situation spoken about is characteristic of an extended period of time -- so extended that the situation is viewed as characteristic of the whole period. The decision that a situation is characteristic of an extended period of time is not in itself linguistic, but once it has been made, an explicitly habitual form can be used to describe it. Note that the classification of a situation as characteristic of a period of time is not derived directly from the comparison of their length or frequency; hence, the situation may be objectively either long or short, and either frequent or infrequent, with respect to the period it characterises. This is because the way we choose to characterise can involve a component which is objectively small in relation to the whole.
Typically, for an aspect value to be labelled as Habitual, the aspectual meaning has to minimally express habituality, although it may additionally express other temporal, aspectual, or modal meanings, or actionality distinctions. Habituality can in principle be combined with any other semantic aspectual values appropriate to situations that can be protracted in time or iterated [Comrie 1976: 26-32]. Since habituality is concerned with the internal temporal structure of the (extended) event, it can be regarded as a sub-type of imperfectivity. [Kibort 2008c: 7]
Instances of gold:HabitualAspect can have the following properties:
| PROPERTY | TYPE | DESCRIPTION | RANGE |
|---|---|---|---|
| From class owl:Thing | |||
| bibliography:hasCitation | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| bibliography:hasEntry | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| bibliography:hasPageInformation | owl:DatatypeProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:abbreviation | owl:DatatypeProperty | The abbreviated form representing a scientific term, e.g., ACC, 2, CL. | owl:Thing |
| gold:adjunct | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:agent | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:agrees | owl:ObjectProperty | A relation holding between syntactic units, often manifesting itself in shared form features. NOTE: this could be better defined once syntactic roles and relations are developed. | owl:Thing |
| gold:allomorph | owl:ObjectProperty | The relation that holds between a morpheme and one of its morphs, an occurrence of a morpheme in context. | owl:Thing |
| gold:allophone | owl:ObjectProperty | The relation that holds between a phoneme and one of its phones, an occurrence of a phoneme in context. | owl:Thing |
| gold:antonym | owl:ObjectProperty | antonym | owl:Thing |
| gold:argument | owl:ObjectProperty | The syntactic entity about which something is predicated. | gold:Clause |
| gold:circumscribes | owl:ObjectProperty | NOTE: still lacks development. This relation holds between two form units and represents the notion of circumscription in a morphosyntactic system. That is, (circumscribes A B) means that part of A comes before B and part of A comes after B, in the linearization of the units of a language. | owl:Thing |
| gold:coda | owl:ObjectProperty | The closing segment of a syllable. | owl:Thing |
| gold:complement | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:directObject | owl:ObjectProperty | A direct object is a grammatical relation that exhibits a combination of certain independent syntactic properties, such as the following: the usual grammatical characteristics of the patient of typically transitive verbs; particular case marking; a particular clause position; the conditioning of an agreement affix on the verb; the capability of becoming the clause subject in passivization; the capability of reflexivization. The identification of the direct object relation may be further confirmed by finding significant overlap with similar direct object relations previously established in other languages. This may be done by analyzing correspondence between translation equivalents [Crystal 1985, 94; Hartmann and Stork 1972, 155; Comrie 1989, 66; Andrews 1985, 68,120,126; Comrie 1985, 337]. | owl:Thing |
| gold:entailedBy | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:entails | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:feature | owl:ObjectProperty | The relation between a linguistic unit and a linguistic feature. A feature inheres in its host. NOTE: this relation is distinct from the hasFeature which pertains to data structures. | gold:LinguisticProperty |
| gold:follows | owl:ObjectProperty | This relation holds between two linguistic units and represents the inverse of 'precedes'. That is, (follows A B) means that A comes after B in the linearization of the realization of linguistic signs. The inverse of this relation is 'precedes'. | owl:Thing |
| gold:freeTranslation | owl:ObjectProperty | The relation between an orthographic expression in one language and some orthographic expression in another such that both expressions have exactly the same meaning. The words in the translation may not correspond to the those in the source expression. | owl:Thing |
| gold:goal | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:hasExample | owl:DatatypeProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:hasGlosses | owl:ObjectProperty | The binary relation holding between an instance of interlinear glossed text (IGT) and a sequence of labels or 'grams' used to describe the morphemes of the IGT. | owl:Thing |
| gold:hasSourceLine | owl:ObjectProperty | The binary relation holding between an instance of interlinear glossed text and a linguistic unit (clause, phrase, etc.) from the source language. | owl:Thing |
| gold:hasTranslationLine | owl:ObjectProperty | The binary relation holding between an instance of interlinear glossed text and a linguistic unit (clause, phrase, etc.) acting as a free translation of the source text from the IGT instance. | owl:Thing |
| gold:head | owl:ObjectProperty | gold:Phrase | |
| gold:hypernym | owl:ObjectProperty | hypernym | owl:Thing |
| gold:indirectObject | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:infixedIn | owl:ObjectProperty | infixedIn is the relation between a Lexical- or SublexicalUnit and a Root. The Root is realized as discontinuous, surrounding the inserted Lexical- or SublexicalUnit [Hartmann and Stork 1972, 111]. | owl:Thing |
| gold:labels | owl:ObjectProperty | This relation names or simply associates some SymbolicString with any Entity. | owl:Thing |
| gold:lexicalRelation | owl:ObjectProperty | This is the superclass of common lexical relatations such as synonym, antonym, etc. NOTE: this needs work. Such relations really pertain to meaning and not form units. | owl:Thing |
| gold:literalTranslation | owl:ObjectProperty | The relation between an orthographic expression in one language and some orthographic expression in another such that the translation is done on a word by word, or morpheme by morpheme, basis without regard for idiomatic usage. | owl:Thing |
| gold:meronym | owl:ObjectProperty | meronym | owl:Thing |
| gold:nucleus | owl:ObjectProperty | The central segment of a syllable. | owl:Thing |
| gold:object | owl:ObjectProperty | An object, traditionally defined, is either a direct object or an indirect object.An object, in some usages, is any grammatical relation other than subject [Crystal 1985, 211; Hartmann and Stork 1972, 155-156; Comrie 1989, 66]. | owl:Thing |
| gold:onset | owl:ObjectProperty | The initial segment of a syllable. | owl:Thing |
| gold:orthographicRep | owl:DatatypeProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:patient | owl:ObjectProperty | A semantic role, often unmarked, that typically does not act with volition, instigate an event, receive something, or experience a sensory impression. A prototypical patient undergoes a physical, visible change in state. Often the subject of a intransitive verb or the logical complement of a transitive verb. [Payne 1997: 50-51; Pei | owl:Thing |
| gold:phonemicRep | owl:DatatypeProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:phoneticRep | owl:DatatypeProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:precedes | owl:ObjectProperty | This relation holds between two linguistic units and represents the notion of precedence in a language. That is, (precedes A B) means that A comes before B in the linearization of the realization of linguistic signs. This inverse of this relation is 'follows'. | owl:Thing |
| gold:predicate | owl:ObjectProperty | The predicate is the relation between the Clause and a portion of a clause, excluding the subject, that expresses something about the subject [Crystal 1980, 280; Hartmann and Stork 1972, 182; Pei and Gaynor 1954, 173; Pike and Pike 1982, 40; Crystal 1985, 241-242]. | gold:Clause |
| gold:prefix | owl:ObjectProperty | The relation between a morphological unit and the lexical unit to which it is attached. The LexicalUnit is usually a Root or Stem. The inverse of prefix is suffix [Crystal 1980, 281; Hartmann and Stork 1972, 182]. | owl:Thing |
| gold:rhyme | owl:ObjectProperty | The core of a syllable, consisting of a nucleus and coda. | owl:Thing |
| gold:semanticRole | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:specifier | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:subject | owl:ObjectProperty | owl:Thing | |
| gold:suffix | owl:ObjectProperty | The relation between a morphological unit and the lexical unit to which it is attached. The LexicalUnit is usually a Root or Stem. The inverse of suffix is 'prefix' [Crystal 1980, 340; Hartmann and Stork 1972, 226]. | owl:Thing |
| gold:synonym | owl:ObjectProperty | synonym | owl:Thing |
| gold:syntacticRole | owl:ObjectProperty | A general category subsuming relations relevant at the level of the Clause, such as predicate and subject. A grammatical relation is a role of a phrase or complement clause that determines syntactic behaviors such as the following: word position in a clause; verb agreement; participation and behavior in such operations as passivization [Comrie 1989, 65-66; Andrews 1985, 66]. | owl:Thing |
| gold:translation | owl:ObjectProperty | The relation between an orthographic expression in one language and some orthographic expression in another such that both expressions have the same or roughly the same meaning. | owl:Thing |
@prefix gold: <http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
gold:HabitualAspect a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "HabitualAspect"@eng ;
rdfs:comment """A value of Aspect Property assigned to the designated element in the clause when the meaning selected for the clause is that which indicates that the situation spoken about is characteristic of an extended period of time -- so extended that the situation is viewed as characteristic of the whole period. The decision that a situation is characteristic of an extended period of time is not in itself linguistic, but once it has been made, an explicitly habitual form can be used to describe it. Note that the classification of a situation as characteristic of a period of time is not derived directly from the comparison of their length or frequency; hence, the situation may be objectively either long or short, and either frequent or infrequent, with respect to the period it characterises. This is because the way we choose to characterise can involve a component which is objectively small in relation to the whole.
Typically, for an aspect value to be labelled as Habitual, the aspectual meaning has to minimally express habituality, although it may additionally express other temporal, aspectual, or modal meanings, or actionality distinctions. Habituality can in principle be combined with any other semantic aspectual values appropriate to situations that can be protracted in time or iterated [Comrie 1976: 26-32]. Since habituality is concerned with the internal temporal structure of the (extended) event, it can be regarded as a sub-type of imperfectivity. [Kibort 2008c: 7]
"""@eng ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy "http://purl.org/linguistics/gold"^^xsd:anyURI ;
rdfs:subClassOf gold:AspectProperty .